Monday, September 28, 2009

Frankenstein

Frankenstein: I think of a large, grotesque, slow moving imbecile. I am of course thinking of the movie and not the gothic work of Mary Shelly. It seems that Hollywood has gone to great lengths to distort what “Frankenstein” is. The monster is just the monster, he doesn’t have a name. I feel that giving him a name is too normal. A name would show that he could fit into society, but it would be impossible for him. The perception of what the monster is and what he appears to be are explored through the novel. Shelly provides so many more layers to the monster and his creator
Frankenstein is an obvious gothic novel, there is the creation of an unnatural life. The monster coming to life sets an uneasy feeling tone. To see a man walk and talk is normal, but the monster, although alive, is uncanny and terrifying. Questions of who controls life and death play on the fears people have about their own mortality. If a scientist can play “God” why believe in anything? An isolation lies in that question, and isolation is felt by Victor himself. He throws himself into work and disregards his family and friends. Victor’s unfortunate for the unknown secrets of science have led him to the secret of life. What appears to be a wildly fantastic discovery, is now the horrific image that haunts his dreams. Victor flees his creation, until they collide on Victor is finally able to hear, from the monster himself, his life.
The monster in Mary Shelly’s novel is the exact opposite of what the movie portrays, but has the characteristics of what a good monster or antagonist should be: strong, elegant with their speech, and well rounded character. The monster has the ability to rely his own account of his life with a sadness. No matter how hard her tries, he can’t fit into normal society.

3 comments:

  1. Nicole, nice post but remember that you need to quote from the text in your blogs. This will help keep your ideas "grounded." I really like your discussion of adaptations of the novel in film. Do you think you could find a picture or a youtube video to help explain what you mean? Also, why is it that film adaptations so grossly change the nature of the creature? What sort of "monsters" does our current contemporary society prefer?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hollywood took the idea of "Frankenstein" and made the monster a complete idiot. He was slow moving and the complete antithesis of the creature Mary Shelly constructed. I think Hollywood creates monsters like "Frankenstein" because it's easier to hate him. He's just a flat one dimensional character. I believe the general public likes to be afraid of monsters, but what we love even more is having man defeat the beast.

    These 3 videos below are references of where the idea of Frankenstein has gone, monster, comedian, and family man

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTNN5h8CG_Y (1931)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOPTriLG5cU (Young Frankenstein)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKM_Lk0MLZQ&feature=PlayList&p=671CDC3FA6D74044&index=3&playnext=4&playnext_from=PL ( the Munsters)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Forgot about the Munsters! Hilarious!

    ReplyDelete